Steele wrote:Sean set up a conventional 800 system for the city a few times over and
You too can see that more then one 800 frequency is being used for fire dispatch’s.
And that really does not explain, what it is that fire is doing when they make a dispatch.
Or what TG 4688 is ?
But thanks for the input, and all of your help
Steele 8)
What I explained is how the Motorola specs for type II trunking works. Any multi select or patch is directed by the controller to a single frequency.
It is possible that the fire dispatcher is actually using the console in some way that they are actually dispatching on two different talkgroups via some multi select on the console rather than thru multi select on the Motorola system. A simplified example would be wiring two buttons together to activate two talkgroups. The system sees that as two different PTT requests.
I wouldn't trust too much what you see on the display of any scanner. Remember, these were reverse engineered and coded by a third party. We all know they didn't implement a type II system correctly, or scanner users wouldn't have problems with this. The scanners have several bugs or oversights. A Motorola radio absolutely has no problem hearing 7A or two patched PD talkgroups. It's totally transparent, whereas the scanners go off into never-never land when 7A comes up. This is the proof that the scanner firmware is deficient in some way.
It seems that you're saying to setup two scanners and watch the frequency displayed. I wouldn't put too much credence in what the display shows. Remember, the scanner is confused in some situations. I've also noticed the scanners get data errors in decoding the control channel quite often. I always hear medics popping up on LE S CMD (for example) and different talkgroups that they don't have in their radio and all other combinations of users being where they shouldn't be. They're not actually there, it's just the scanner decoded something wrong, most likely due to a bit error in decoding the CC.
4688 is probably just a talkgroup that we never identified and wasn't used until recently. It's a valid type II group, (div/16). It's not a resultant group because of a bit flag.
I'll make some inquires and see if I can get the scoop on FD's dispatching protocols.